Friday, September 25, 2020
Home Specialties Women’s Health A 12-Month Supply of Birth Control Pills Cuts Costs and Unintended Pregnancies

A 12-Month Supply of Birth Control Pills Cuts Costs and Unintended Pregnancies

Providing your patients 12 months’ worth of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) up front saves money and is more successful at preventing unintended pregnancies than a standard three-month refill, according to new research published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

What Did the Study Find?

The study, led by Colleen Judge-Golden at the University of Pittsburgh, found that supplying 12 months of birth control pills to female veterans at the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system saved $87.12 per patient, or more than $2 million annually.

RELATED: Analysis Shows Uneven Quality of Care in VA Hospitals

Following most U.S. health protocols, the VA dispenses prescription medications, including OCPs, in three-month increments. Under this plan, VA data shows 43 percent of women experience, at a minimum, a seven-day gap between refills. If a woman misses two consecutive days of birth control, she has an increased risk of pregnancy. With a one-year supply, women experience fewer gaps and more consistent, improved protection.

The researchers found the primary source of cost savings was mitigating unintended pregnancies. Using a mathematical model based on 24,309 sexually active women who did not want to get pregnant for at least one year, they determined a 12-month supply would prevent an estimated 583 unintended pregnancies annually.

The study’s outcomes show that prescribing 12 months of contraceptive pills would not only support reproductive autonomy and help women meet their reproductive goals, but would also be economically feasible for the entire VA healthcare system.

Why Does the Study Matter?

Currently, 70 percent of women who use birth control receive a supply of three months or less, while only 15 percent receive more than six months’ worth, according to the Henry J. Kaiser Foundation. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have passed laws mandating that insurers must cover a 12-month supply.

But in an era where access to contraception is riddled with controversy and millions live in locations considered “contraceptive deserts,” the study indicates that many women’s contraceptive needs are not being met.

RELATED: “Can You Be a Pro-Life Nurse?”: 7 Healthcare Providers Share Their Perspective on Abortion

Skeptics believe switching to a one-year plan could weaken provider relationships because patients would not have to undergo a consultation every third month. In addition, a long-term prescription could place more power into the hands of the patient and result in medication wastage. However, Judge-Golden’s findings echo prior research highlighting the benefits of providing a one-year supply of birth control — namely lower costs and fewer unintended pregnancies and abortions.

The following are a list of states where insurers must currently cover a 12-month supply of contraceptive pills:

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • District of Columbia
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Maine
  • Maryland*
  • Massachusetts
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Rhode Island
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington

*Effective 2020.

Financial Implications of 12-Month Dispensing of Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System, JAMA.
Oral Contraceptive Pills, Kaiser Family Foundation.

Last updated on 10/9/19.

Subscribe to Newsletter


Must Read

healthcare provider coronavirus

How to Keep Migraine Patients From Coming Back to the ER

Quick, what's the best thing to do with a patient who presents with an excruciating migraine headache? If you're not quite sure,...

Sign up for the Daily Huddle newsletter today!

Consider this your nurses station news fix. Give us 3 minutes and we’ll update you on all the news that pertains to you and all you do.