Advertisement
Monday, November 18, 2019
Home Specialties Cardiology Most Dietary Supplements and Interventions Fail to Prevent Negative Cardiovascular Outcomes

Most Dietary Supplements and Interventions Fail to Prevent Negative Cardiovascular Outcomes

More than half of all Americans take dietary supplements every day. Many follow well-known diets to protect themselves from cardiovascular disease and to prevent premature death.

Dietary intervention measures can be a tricky topic for healthcare professionals to address with their patients. When faced with questions about popular and easily-accessible vitamins, minerals or diets, there’s a fine line between provider expertise and widespread belief. But a new study published in Annals of Internal Medicine might make your conversations about the use of supplements a little easier and more evidence-based.

RELATED: A Diet Rich in Whole Grain May Prevent Liver Cancer

What did the study find?

Researchers, led by Dr. Safi U. Khan at West Virginia University School of Medicine, analyzed 277 randomized control trials, consisting of approximately one million people. They measured the efficacy of 16 popular supplements and eight widely-recommended diets in preventing heart disease.

The bottom line, according to Khan: Supplement-users should take claims of cardiovascular benefits with a grain of salt.

“This large study has a very simple message,” Khan said. “Do not waste your money on these supplements, because they do not act.”

Of the 16 supplements examined, omega-3 — the long-chain fatty acids found in fish oil — was the only one that showed some protective benefit against heart attack. Folic acid showed some protective benefit against stroke, though this evidence was largely driven by the inclusion of a study from China, where a folate-rich diet is not routine. Most alarmingly, one supplement indicated an increased risk for stroke: Calcium combined with vitamin D.

Of the eight diets, reduced-salt regimens improved mortality among participants with normal blood pressure.  The researchers reported that other common diets — Mediterranean diet, reduced dietary fat, modified dietary fat and reduced saturated fat intake — had no effect on cardiovascular risk.   

The authors of the study reported the remaining surveyed supplements had no significant effect on mortality or cardiovascular outcomes. These included: multivitamins, selenium, vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamin D alone, calcium alone, folic acid and iron.

“The omega-3 fatty acid might be helpful,” Khan said. “But we have far [better] cardiovascular medications, which can provide you more robust benefit compared to this.”

RELATED: 40 Million Americans in Food-Insecure Households are at Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

What does this mean for healthcare providers?

With a large number of Americans regularly using many of the aforementioned supplements, Khan’s findings are bound to elicit skepticism. The results of the study were influenced by factors such as geographic considerations and reliance on participant memory.  Furthermore, conclusions centered around diet can be hard to interpret, considering the vastly different ways patients react to nutritional changes.

“These findings were limited by suboptimal quantity of evidence,” Khan said. “But that said, they may inform discussions regarding the use of these interventions in patients who are at the risk of cardiovascular disease.”

The researchers say for now, it’s best to hold off on using and recommending supplements or diet modification for the purpose of cardiovascular disease prevention.

References:

Ann Intern Med. 2019;171:190-198. doi:10.7326/M19-0341

Last updated on 10/8/19.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Sponsor

Must Read

Medical news, career advice and lifestyle tips - hand-picked for health professionals and delivered right to your inbox!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY